Today, I Reveal Who Satoshi Nakamoto Is

Leverage our AI Software with this revelation to trade the next decade, not the last one

I did not realize why I had become so deeply obsessed with crypto. At first I blamed the daily bombardment of tweets on X, served to me like unsolicited sermons on tokens and charts.

But by the time I noticed, it was too late. I had gone down the crypto rabbit hole one time too many. And after days of digesting news, stock events, and those peculiar flashes of intuition that strike late at night, I emerged with a conclusion that now seems almost obvious:

Jensen Huang is Satoshi Nakamoto

The strange part is that the answer sits in front of us like something from a Spielberg film, staring directly into our eyes while we fail to recognize it. We spend our time chasing illusions, reading about this scandal or that file, while missing the living Indiana Jones walking across the world stage in a leather jacket. But I am not interested in the tabloid past. Investors must look to the future, and the future often begins in places that resemble fiction.

Recently, while reading Sherlock Holmes to my son, I noticed something in Conan Doyle’s method. The way Holmes approaches a problem is similar to how a good investor approaches a theme: you observe quietly, make note of patterns, eliminate the impossible, and allow the improbable to reveal itself.

And since identifying Satoshi (especially if I am right) is no ordinary deduction, I decided to lay this out the way Holmes might explain it to Watson.

Picture Holmes and Watson not in London but seated at a modern kava bar. Holmes with kratom and a hookah. Watson with a flask of whiskey. Holmes taps the table.

“There are mysteries, Watson, that descend like fog upon the Thames. They reveal their outlines only to the one who studies how men think rather than what they say. The question of Satoshi Nakamoto is such a mystery. And I do believe I have a culprit in mind. I am not ashamed if my deduction proves imperfect, for all grand theories stumble somewhere. Still, the pattern is unmistakable.

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

The first clue enters from fiction. A linguist named Hoshi Sato in Star Trek: Enterprise, especially in the episode “Fight or Flight.” Timid, brilliant, terrified, yet capable of building the Universal Translator that bridges hostile cultures. When I said her name aloud, I heard it instantly: Hoshi Sato becomes Sato-shi, and from that sound emerges “Satoshi.” A coincidence, perhaps, but no student of imagination dismisses the origins of names.

The second clue appears in Star Trek: The Next Generation in the episode “The Measure of a Man.” Vice Admiral Nakamura presides there over questions of autonomy and self-ownership, determining whether an artificial being has the right to its own future. Nakamura and Nakamoto differ by only a softened vowel. The philosophical alignment is too close to ignore.

But the third clue does not come from fiction. It comes from a man of silicon: Jensen Huang. He stands at the crossroads of East and West, of politics and technology, of art and math. He walks into meetings with heads of state. He fist-bumps presidents and princes. He built GPUs that became the engine of Bitcoin mining. Without him, Bitcoin would have remained an obscure academic toy.

He is the Magus of our age. And like all Magi, he delivers gifts:

Gold in the form of digital scarcity.
Frankincense in the form of artificial intelligence.
Myrrh in the form of a new reality built out of simulation.

His headquarters looks like Starfleet Command.
His conference rooms are named after starships.
He built something called the Holodeck without irony.

A man so immersed in the Star Trek vision that he recreates it in real life is a man fully capable of crafting a pseudonym from Hoshi and Nakamura and using it to sign a revolutionary invention. And I will say plainly what I believe:

Jensen is Satoshi, and Satoshi is Jensen.

If I am wrong, I am wrong. It does not matter. Because if it is not Jensen, then it is someone with Jensen’s worldview: someone who loved Star Trek, someone who dreamed of the future, someone who believed in universal translators and autonomous beings, someone who saw the future first and built toward it with full conviction.

What matters is not the identity but the pattern.

We now live in an age where ideas once relegated to science fiction are stepping out of the screen and into the markets. Engineers who admired the translators of Star Trek are now building universal translators for value, trust, and money. And a pseudonym that began as a playful tribute to two characters has become a flag for an entirely new economic universe.

This is the purpose of following these patterns. When we observe how people observe the world, we see how frameworks are built. Once those frameworks lock into place, reality folds itself into them.

Economics itself evolved through such eras: mercantilism, classical, Keynesian, Friedmanite. Each one shaped the world through a narrative.

But now we are leaving the age of classical economics. We are entering the science-fiction age. The tools imagined in stories will become the tools that shape markets, nations, and identity. The worlds we admired are becoming the worlds we build.

I write this not to claim victory in a deduction, but to show how, when you observe the world with the eye of a detective, you can spot the next great frontier before the rest of society catches up. The future is not predicted. It is imagined. And those who imagine it first are usually the ones who profit from it.

AI SOFTWARE

Our new software, based on these observations, is designed to generate expectations of future moves in stocks and cryptocurrencies, and in beta.

Join the conversation if you wish to see what we’re seeing.

Paid subscribers I show a lot more love

and with that onto a new mystery

HAVE A GREAT DAY